Yes, I did. Which is wonderful.
What about yourself Michele?
meaningless awards imo, given past winners (and contenders)
Well Michele, I say what I think... I say positive things when I feel it is justified and negative stuff when it is due too..
To be honest, I think I was thinking of the "golden spider award" when I replied to the post (or whatever it was called), which was a total Joke.. hence the negativity in my post.
As for being nominated for awards, I am not interested in winning any awards tyvm. as for pointing you to awards that are meaningful, real winners only compete against themselves IMO.
"net visionary" huh. I haven't seen anyone here do anything particularly original or cutting edge or proactive (nor do I claim to have done so b.t.w).. so I shall reserve judgement until I see who wins..
Regards
Niall the negative c***.
I have to side with Niall here. I'm not trying to be negative about the IIA's... they're certainly more honorable and altruistic than the Golden Spanners. Having said this, it's a popularity contest and not really a mark of quality in most cases. I'm not going to name names here, but last year there were some very undeserving winners. I can only assume that those on top of their game don't bother entering.
As Niall says, real winners only compete against themselves.
Fair enough
I kinda jumped down your throat earlier today, didn't I - sorry!
i'm in too and I made sure to vote for michele and grandad